jittygitty

@mcmilk When you said: > "A really cool thing would be, when we define some interface for interacting with crypto stuff provided by the operating systems. Of cause, linux won't...

@robn Thanks for confirming on behalf of @mcmilk but my follow-up wasn't going to be anything about licensing (thoughts on that is at https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/discussions/14630 and #14555 ), but a rough...

@ryao Thanks for the reply, I got your email, so I'll respond more in depth there. Yes, I agree ICP has some pros as you said, I've never been against...

@microcai > time to license openzfs as GPL ! No, not at all! Time to just BUILD ZFS as if it is GPL, we have every right to do that:...

@eirnym I would prefer we keep license discussions separate from bug reports etc (but those I opened were "closed"), so to answer your question, anyone can still use even closed...

@ryao "Having the Linux kernel relicensed would be more realistic. Linus Torvalds has enough influence among Linux copyright holders that he could likely get a license change done if he...

@ryao I haven't done directly or indirectly what I had "joked" about because it's NOT the best way to do it. Perhaps I should put a warning here the only/best...

I forgot to answer: "...how we will handle this latest compatibility issue"? Are you ok with what I already proposed? Change CDDL to GPL and build. Simplest fix, isn't it?...

@mabod Yes you are right that "anything" inside the code of Linux kernel can be changed and even distributed since it is GPL after all. But PLEASE do not go...

@RaitoBezarius But why bother with such a patch and risk further friction with Linux kernel devs, when no one here will be upset if you simply change CDDL to GPL...