jimsalterjrs
slicing the result set start,stop,step
this adds -l to slice the result set
-l start:stop:step e.g: -l 0:10 # top ten -l 10:0:-1 # top ten in reverse order
This feels a bit weird for my taste. I'm not sure I see the utility in arbitrary slicing of results, and it's a remarkably unintuitive way of reversing sort order - that perhaps calls for a dedicated flag.
It's even worse for -2.
I guess this is not about using slice, but you'd prefer dedicated arguments/parameters instead of the single start:stop:step slice parameter?
Separate flags would be my preference, and they all need to be able to justify themselves.
e.g. for reversing sort order, ioztat -s operations in a terminal puts all the interesting stuff at the start of the output - which likely scrolls out of view in a lot of systems, so being able to put the biggest values at the end of the output seems justified.
For top-n results, I guess that can also be justified - it lets you size the displayed results without using -o, so you can get scrollback in results while having each one fit in your terminal.
I run out of steam when trying to think of a justification for arbitrary slices of results. Top-ten sorted? Fair enough. Top tenth through twentieth? Scratching my head on that one.