nerdamer
nerdamer copied to clipboard
If you label some issues, label them all!
Assuming 'bug' is incorrect outcome, 'enhancement' is extending/adding features, and 'question' for not-bug-nor-enhancements.
A quick analysis on all open issues:
Issue | Label | Labelled? | Additional actions (if different from solving the issue) |
---|---|---|---|
#84 | bug | No | Close and move to #181 after work has started there |
#117 | bug | No | Close as no response |
#119 | enhancement | Yes | None |
#121 | enhancement | Yes | None |
#122 | enhancement | Yes | None |
#123 | bug | Yes | None |
#124 | bug | Yes | None |
#126 | bug | Yes | None |
#127 | quirk | No | None |
#128 | bug | No | None |
#129 | enhancement | Yes | None |
#130 | bug | No | None |
#131 | enhancement | No | None |
#133 | bug | No | None |
#134 | enhancement | No | None |
#135 | enhancement | No | Close as added after adding tests |
#136 | bug | No | ~Close as invalid (also label as invalid)~ Edit: Needs investigation |
#137 | bug | No | None |
#138 | question | No | Close as answered |
#139 | bug | No | None |
#140 | enhancement | No | None |
#141 | enhancement | No | None |
#143 | enhancement | Yes | None |
#144 | enhancement | No | None |
#146 | bug | No | None |
#147 | enhancement | No | None |
#148 | enhancement | No | None |
#149 | enhancement | No | Close as added after adding tests |
#150 | enhancement | Yes | Close as added after adding tests |
#151 | bug | No | None |
#153 | enhancement | No | None |
#154 | enhancement | No | None |
#155 | enhancement | Yes | None |
#156 | question | No | None |
#158 | bug | Yes | Relabel from question to bug because it is a bug |
#160 | enhancement | No | Close as added after adding tests |
#161 | bug | Yes | None |
#163 | enhancement | No | None |
#164 | bug | Yes | None |
#165 | bug | No | None |
#166 | enhancement | No | None |
#167 | enhancement | No | None |
#170 | question | No | None |
#181 | enhancement | Yes | None |
#182 | enhancement | No | None |
#183 | enhancement | No | None |
#184 | enhancement | No | None |
#185 | enhancement | No | None |
Please change all the above Noes to Yeses.
Aside from using existing labels, maybe also add new labels to indicate the area of issue:
Area | Possible Name 1 | Possible Name 2 | Possible Name 3 | Includes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nerdamer the library | (unlabeled) | library | nerdamer-library | nerdamer.core, unit tests, source code, etc. |
Nerdamer the website | nerdamer.com | website | nerdamer-website | Documentation, demo, Getting Started etc. |
Nerdamer the repository | meta | repo | nerdamer-repo | Wiki, Issues, pull requests, etc. |
Maybe split them more into docs, demo, meta, source-code, unit-tests, etc. what do you think?
Please change all the above Noes to Yeses.
Ok. I'll try to to get to this as soon as possible.
Maybe split them more into docs, demo, meta, source-code, unit-tests, etc. what do you think?
Sounds good. The current labels that Github provides don't cover many scenarios. I'm not sure you can create new ones. I know that Gitlab allows you to. It would be nice if we could do this. Maybe just a table then but then that requires maintenance.
Yes, you can create new labels. In the Labels tab under Issues, there is a green New Label button at the right.
Ummm... Still considered?
Documenting operators moved to this issue
Umm... I don't see the relation between this issue (organising other issues on GitHub) and #184 (Documenting operators).