Joe Hamman

> Thanks for pushing this, guys. I find it unfortunate that the stores weren't in their own modules since I'd very much for keeping their git history. I'd be inclined...

@rabernat - We are gearing up to work on the Terraclimate recipe again. We also have an existing feedstock with this recipe (https://github.com/pangeo-forge/terraclimate-feedstock). Do you have suggestions on the best...

Thanks @RobbieMcKinstry, fwiw, I've got a bit of a workaround working now: ```yaml steps: - name: Turnstyle ... - uses: chrnorm/deployment-action@v2 name: Create GitHub deployment id: deployment with: token: "${{...

> Am I right to think that V3 reference sets will currently fail in MultiZarrToZarr? Do you have an estimate of how complex it would be to support? Yes, I...

Somehow I messed up my fork here. I'm going to close this PR and I'll reopen.

Today I learned that there is a v1 to v2 migrator in the zarr-python codebase: https://github.com/zarr-developers/zarr-python/blob/6105ef203e3e5c5390aa01db613bc42e8fb98c1a/zarr/storage.py#L1941-L1956

see https://github.com/pangeo-data/scikit-downscale/pull/57

Thanks for this @dstansby - as you now know, we're onto the v3 branch where we're not using conda, so I'm going to close this out.

I lean toward omitting support for implicit groups until https://github.com/zarr-developers/zarr-specs/issues/291 is resolved. My experience, similar to yours, is that implicit groups are a total pain and are going to require...

To summarize from today's meeting, we are going to work https://github.com/zarr-developers/zarr-specs/issues/291 towards removing implicit groups from the spec. In the meantime, it seems like a safe bet to remove them...