James Foucar
James Foucar
Merged to next.
Re-merged to next.
@rljacob , fixed.
@rljacob , done.
> Or should they be free to use different ones? I think the latter is the right choice I agree although we will all have to be really careful to...
I don't think we still need it.
@cwpearson , I think it's right. The c==0 part I removed assumed there was only one item, which should hold true in both cases. Oh, it also assumed the c==0...
@lucbv , another option for the backwards loops that may be easier to read: ``` for (lno_t r = numRows - 1; r != static_cast(-1); --r) { ```
@lucbv , see if you like the current version better.
@ndellingwood , good point. That is a downside of the giant reformat commit that --ignore-revs-file kind of forces us into. How important is it for `git blame` to automatically hide...