Jannis Leidel

There is more coming related to this soon. I've marked this for the March release cycle since that's probably the timeframe for that upcoming release.

@beckermr Yeah, we recently changed the `conda.plan` upstream in https://github.com/conda/conda/pull/14603, which is why this is showing up for canary tests now. I've added the line to the config to ignore...

Please join Jazzband on https://jazzband.co/join, which will give you write permissions to Jazzband repos. If you're interested in helping with a specific project, you may join a specific project team...

We're using 1.21 of 1 GB of data storage and 4 of 1 GB of traffic. So this isn't resolved as such, just not breaking the conda org. I'll buy...

Done, this is now 50 GB for traffic and storage for the conda org per month. Please let me know if you need more, preferable ahead of time via a...

@kenodegard @jaimergp This bubbled thanks to stalebot, do we still need this? I wonder if this would be helpful for the wheel efforts?

@baustinceltic Not as such, I'll make it top priority for me now.

@baustinceltic FYI I've created an epic for this, as it requires a few more steps: https://github.com/conda/cla/issues/1

Some of those seem like side-effects of relying on a downstream instance of conda's test suite, but with a custom workflow file, that we have to keep in sync. Inlining...

I think we could instead maintain a reusable version of conda's tests workflow in the `conda/conda` repo and use that instead here to reduce the sync issue between the two....