Jesse Wright

Should we add proper validation to writer at the same time (e.g. for the cases in #330)?

> I wonder if this has repercussions for https://github.com/rdfjs/N3.js/pull/339; should we have a generic flag for "out of syntax features"? ...perhaps, though I worry about performance degradation doing it internally;...

As an aside - are there any RDF syntaxes that don't support `a` shortand in the subject or object position? If not then the following logic could just be moved...

To quickly jump in with my 2cents: I think there is definitely value in having validation; but that it should be opt-in given that there are cases in which it...

Note to self for when I revisit in the morning - the matrix based rdf-star tests appear to be passing even on cases they should be failing and erroring. I...

Before releasing we should make sure that our mime types for rdf-star are correct.

The example complains if we just have a plain string ```ts const n3 = `"1" .`; const parser = new Parser({ format: 'text/n3' }); const store = new Store(parser.parse(n3)); ```...

@joachimvh I've been having some more fun with this ... --- I think the following dupes #329 - but for completeness ```ts import { Parser, Writer } from 'n3'; const...

As an actionable item could we please get the following tests passing in N3Parser-test.js ```ts describe('A Parser instance for the N3 format', () => { function parser() { return new...

And a test case for `:s :p [ :p1 {"a" :p2 "b"} ].` and `:s :p {"a" :p2 "b"}.`