lazygit icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
lazygit copied to clipboard

Please provide feedback for lazygit!

Open jesseduffield opened this issue 3 years ago • 6 comments

I've whipped up a questionnaire to help get an idea for what changes people would like to see in lazygit, and what its current strengths are. It's only a handful of questions

https://forms.gle/AdFEuLy2dikcmK4F7

Any and all feedback is much appreciated! 🙏

jesseduffield avatar Apr 05 '21 04:04 jesseduffield

I've whipped up a questionnaire to help get an idea for what changes people would like to see in lazygit, and what its current strengths are. It's only a handful of questions

https://forms.gle/AdFEuLy2dikcmK4F7

Any and all feedback is much appreciated! 🙏

Sandesh333333 avatar Jan 20 '22 06:01 Sandesh333333

Is the form still intended to be filled out? I did, but if not wanted to know where I should pitch a suggestion and gauge feasibility. Thanks in advance, and I appreciate this project SO much! 😁

mchisolm0 avatar May 26 '24 04:05 mchisolm0

@mchisolm0 yes I still check on the form responses every now and then. But if you have a specific suggestion to pitch, please raise an issue

jesseduffield avatar May 26 '24 22:05 jesseduffield

I'm gonna paste my comment made in another discussion here

Just today I ran into the same situation as you when testing bare repos on lazygit and personally I find it confusing. I think that I have a couple of suggestions to enhance the experience when working with worktrees on a bare repo:

  • Ability to execute lazygit in the root of the bare repo, right now you have to go into one of the worktrees for lazygit to be able to launch. This is just a minor QoL not having to do cd once more and go to a worktree before calling lazygit.
  • I think in the case of a bare repo, worktrees currently located in panel 2 should replace local branches in panel 3. That way you avoid the confusion and all the clutter with local branches. Also allows for a speedier workflow since you don't have to be changing panel's 2 depth to see files status.

To be honest, I'm not quite sure about the rationale to put worktrees on pane 2, my understanding is that while you can do worktrees on a NOT bare repo, as per ThePrimeagen video on it (link here), the structure is a mess. Thus I think the recommendation is to use bare repos when using worktrees such that you can use them as independent branches, which would lead to this recommendation.

I'll keep on experimenting with bare repos and I'll keep on providing feedback.

gfvioli avatar Aug 08 '24 19:08 gfvioli