Jerome Simeon
Jerome Simeon
> This is super interesting, I like it! I'm a bit unclear about some of it though. Why wouldn't the `.sdf` have the template (`.cta`) within it? And would this...
> Ahhh I think I'm getting it. So in `.cta`, the logic and text (`sample.md`) can be modified. But creating an _instantiation_ of the `.cta`, which is a `.sdf`, compiles...
> Cool stuff! I have two immediate thoughts on this. > > (1) Taking the smart document thing to an extreme: why not embed all the "smart things" directly in...
Thanks @peterhunn for the thoughtful and very interesting feedback. > My $0.02 on naming. The `.slc` is well taken @martinhalford. I'm not so bearish on the reference to a document...
Names are fun. I don't like "Smart Contract Format" because of "Smart Contract". I do like: - Smart Legal Contract Format (`.slcf`) - Executable Document format (`.xdoc`, `.xdf`)
> > xdf > > I think this gets my vote of the proposals so far. "Executable Document Format" is nice and explicit, and as a three-letter-acronym it makes a...
Issue inherited from #392
Q: Would we want to support parsing of those (e.g., as an alternative to the digit-based syntax) or would this behave more like an Ergo formula?
@peterhunn Thanks for the insights. Very useful. > > Perhaps this could be a specified type like `DateTime`? > That's an interesting idea. This could be an extension to the...
> > One more question: do you sometimes have _only_ the words but not the corresponding number? (e.g., `in the amount of ten thousands dollars`. > > Yes, some [best...