Jeremy D

@Sebastix you may have been reading an outdated NIP.. I was surprised to find that https://nostr-nips.com/nip-42 is completely wrong. The Actual nip (https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips/blob/master/42.md) talks about the flow pre-auth is to...

> [@jeremyd](https://github.com/jeremyd) That source is indeed outdated. I alway use nips.nostr.com/ or the Github NIPs repo. > > [@mleku](https://github.com/mleku) The relay `wss://mleku.realy.lol` is now working well. > > When testing...

> When a relay sends a `AUTH`, the challenge string is temporary saved so it could be used later when the relay responds with a `auth-required: ` message. When this...

This is cool. What do you think about having an optional ["r", "wss://pollrelay"] as a tag? So that if you wanted the poll to happen on a specific relay that...

> The relay for polls should be the same relay you send reactions to. If this is a Kind 1 post, it should go to the NIP-65 READ relays of...

> 1. There is never going to be a "true tally". > 2. Should clients also send replies, other reactions, and all the other stuff people can do to a...

> What nak version? This was an issue some versions ago when I changed the WebSocket library, but I think it isn't anymore. Or maybe when the message is way...