[WIP] Implement Token Expiry Check and Refresh using Refresh Tokens

[krezovic]

DO NOT MERGE. Initial RFC for approach.

Testing done

### Submitter checklist
- [ ] Make sure you are opening from a **topic/feature/bugfix branch** (right side) and not your main branch!
- [ ] Ensure that the pull request title represents the desired changelog entry
- [ ] Please describe what you did
- [ ] Link to relevant issues in GitHub or Jira
- [ ] Link to relevant pull requests, esp. upstream and downstream changes
- [ ] Ensure you have provided tests - that demonstrates feature works or fixes the issue

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 62.58503% with 55 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 71.81%. Comparing base (bca3705) to head (f7dcfd0). Report is 11 commits behind head on master.

Files	Patch %	Lines
...va/org/jenkinsci/plugins/oic/OicSecurityRealm.java	63.02%	30 Missing and 14 partials :warning:
...java/org/jenkinsci/plugins/oic/OicCredentials.java	64.00%	8 Missing and 1 partial :warning:
...gins/oic/WellKnownOpenIDConfigurationResponse.java	33.33%	1 Missing and 1 partial :warning:

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master     #310      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     72.46%   71.81%   -0.65%     
- Complexity      201      233      +32     
============================================
  Files             9       11       +2     
  Lines           839      990     +151     
  Branches        119      143      +24     
============================================
+ Hits            608      711     +103     
- Misses          170      201      +31     
- Partials         61       78      +17     

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[krezovic]

Hi @michael-doubez, this is a working draft where the most basic and common functionality works:

• Added "Enable/disable refresh token" support - a simple checkbox when "manual config", detected when "automatic config" by querying "supproted_grant_types" discovery response attribute
• Added "strict" mode (disabled by default) that indicates whether an expired access token and missing refresh token, or simply failed refresh request (due to various reasons) will result in "401" or we simply ignore it
• Added configurable clock skew that prolongs lifetime of an access token for a pre-configured amount of seconds to adjust for any time sync issues. Defaults to 60 seconds
• Any updated roles/groups are reflected on every token refresh, as they should be

Now, before I move on to update documentation and write some tests, I'd like to get some feedback if the approach is correct. In addition, I have additional points that I have noticed but not sure if I should handle or how to handle at all.

• First and most obvious point: In the build pipeline there is a warning that "accessToken" and "refreshToken" look sensitive and may be stored in plain text files. I have no idea where the SecurityContext is stored, so do you think we should mark the tokens as credentials?
• There is a concurrency issue where two parallel requests will trigger two token refresh requests at the same time. I am unable to find a good place for a synchronization object that does not involve a manual clean up. Should I take care about this? If yes, do you happen to know if there's any place that I could place a synchronization primitive such as timestamp of first request that triggered the refresh, and to let any subsequent parallel requests just skip the refresh as it's "being handled"? Is there any "self-cleaning" cache used elsewhere in the project that I could hook into?

Just for fun, without any activity I keep my jenkins tab opened and UI triggers a lot of requests every x seconds, resulting in at least 2 token refresh requests without any activity

• When a Token is expired, no refresh can be performed, and strict mode is on, should we simply redirect the user to the logout URL or do we clean up the session manually and simply "halt"?

Any additional feedback is welcome.

[michael-doubez]

Hello,

Thanks for the work. You can ignore the warnings about secret leaking, they are mostly irrelevant. I'll check the concurrency issue but if the information is local to a user context, there shouldn't be any issue.

There are a lot of features in the PR. I would break them down into:

• [ ] handle session timeout: if refresh/offline token is unavailable or expired, how to clear session information and request re-login
• [ ] handle additional (refresh) token lifetime : how to request it if available, as you did. It should be store in session information such as to be available globally, it may also be revoked at logout because lifetime is typically longer than access token
• [ ] handle refresh of user info

I should be able to review in depth and (hopefuly) provide relevant feedback next Sunday.

[krezovic]

Hello,

I believe I have handled most of the use-cases except the logout. The question remains on how do we proceed.

Answering the points in the order they were raised

• Easiest way to do this is to request log out at IdP. This is an already supported feature. This will invalidate the refresh token, and next refresh will fail. This use-case has been handled and works without clearing the Jenkins related session stuff (as of yet - we have to agree on how to proceed)
• Refresh tokens may be extended indefinitely as long as the session is active on the IdP. I wouldn't go beyond what was done here as described in step 1 - refresh token returns "invalid_grant" -> assume RT is expired or revoked -> destroy the user session. User may be logged elsewhere out of IdP and detecting this is a bit more bothersome than I'd like to go into - but there are standards on how to handle this scenario (see below)
• Refresh of user info and ID token has already been incorporated in the MR and I re-used the existing userinfo request code and IdToken decoding (without the validations - but that can be re-used if needed, as well)

Back to the first point, we can implement additional features if needed, namely

• We implement Token Revocation on manual logout when redirect to IdP has been disabled https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7009
• We add support for OpenID Front and/or Back Channel Logout https://openid.net/specs/openid-connect-frontchannel-1_0.html / https://openid.net/specs/openid-connect-backchannel-1_0.html
• We add support OpenID Session Management and check_session_iframe, although I'm not sure how widely it's supported. Not even latest Spring Security supports it https://openid.net/specs/openid-connect-session-1_0.html

[michael-doubez]

@krezovic the change looks good to me.

What bothers me most is the idtoken kept in the session information. It should be removed and kept only in the credentials but that can be ironed out later.

[krezovic]

Thanks for the feedback @michael-doubez. I have removed IdToken from Session and moved it strictly to SecurityContext.

Thank you @jglick for spotting missing Serializable and for bumping this MR as I completely forgot about it.

With that said and done, the MR is now ready for review and hopefully merging.

[krezovic]

Thanks to @jglick for brief explanation on what I've missed and the original purpose of issue #100.

The plugin will now serialize OIDC tokens into User object so they are valid when accessing the instance with API Keys.

Logging with an API Key will also trigger token refresh if AT has expired. If RT has also expired or has been revoked, the request made with API Key will correctly return 401.

Downside of this is that all API Keys will automatically become invalid when "Log out from OIDC Provider" option has been selected. For this scenario, I have nullified all token values in this scenario so no token refresh will be attempted but the expiration logic will correctly detect an expired token.

Edit: I am not sure how to write a test for this scenario. I am unable to find any documentation for public REST API that may return 401/403 for API Tokens with Jenkins Test Instance (I'd expect at least a "whoami" request to exist). Any help on this topic is welcome.

[mikecirioli]

I've been playing with this in a local cluster and the easiest way i've found is to:

• Create a job or folder that your test user should be able to access
• set the AT expiration to something short (60s)
• use the cli command list-jobs (using an access token) - verify that you can see the job
• wait 60 seconds (or manually invalidate the access token
• use the cli command list-jobs (using an access token) - verify that you now get a 403 type response You can also use the HTTP api to do the same list-jobs check

[krezovic]

I've been playing with this in a local cluster and the easiest way i've found is to:

• Create a job or folder that your test user should be able to access
• set the AT expiration to something short (60s)
• use the cli command list-jobs (using an access token) - verify that you can see the job
• wait 60 seconds (or manually invalidate the access token
• use the cli command list-jobs (using an access token) - verify that you now get a 403 type response You can also use the HTTP api to do the same list-jobs check

Hi. I was more asking in context of "integration test" jenkins instance (in PluginTest, annotated with @JenkinsRule). Which is why I said I'd prefer a REST API and that I do not have to configure or enable security manually on the test instance - not sure what the consequences will be.

Do note that I can easily call the HTML page users/testUser (which is the uid of the test user that's created), but this works both with authentication and without any authentication - so I'm kinda in conflict.

[mikecirioli]

I'll try to take a look later today or this weekend and see if i can help contribute a test. So far, i have not been able to successfully get the plugin to refresh my users authorities after i have removed them from the IDP, and access token remains working.

Strict token expiration does successfully revoke jenkins api token access when the primary token expires.

UPDATE:

I can now see that the granted authorities change when i remove the user from the org. I need to tweak my auth strategy in jenkins to fully test though because the token requests still show authenticated which i'm not sure is what i expect.

[mikecirioli]

@krezovic what else needs to be done in order to merge this PR? Is there something you need a hand with or are you just waiting for me feedback?

[michael-doubez]

@krezovic conflicts needs to be resolved.

IMHO we can merge it as it is.

[michael-doubez]

@krezovic I have been working on the merge, I should be able to contribute it before the end of the week

[michael-doubez]

See https://github.com/michael-doubez/oic-auth-plugin/tree/token_refresh

Note: some unit test still to adapt/fix

[krezovic]

See https://github.com/michael-doubez/oic-auth-plugin/tree/token_refresh

Note: some unit test still to adapt/fix

Hi. Thanks for doing the heavy lifting. I was already halfway through and was hoping to finish it over the weekend. Your changes to test really helped and now I have finished fixing the tests and took a bit different approach than you in passing the nullable refresh token.