github-pr-coverage-status-plugin

github-pr-coverage-status-plugin copied to clipboard

#42 #35 #28 set/get master coverage by repo URL instead of PR URL

10

terma

We see: ``` Unknown parameter(s) found for class type 'com.github.terma.jenkins.githubprcoveragestatus.CompareCoverageAction': jacocoCounterType ``` when using documented approach from [README.md](https://github.com/jenkinsci/github-pr-coverage-status-plugin/blob/master/README.md#how-to-use-with-jenkins-pipelines): ``` if ('SUCCESS' == currentBuild.currentResult) { currentBuild.result = 'SUCCESS' step([$class: 'CompareCoverageAction', jacocoCounterType:...

dmarjanovic

Add documentation for options including `publishResultAs`, `scmVars`, etc

1

Hi maintainers! First, thanks for publishing this plugin. It's been a great help to my team's workflow. While using this plugin, I found the README documentation pretty unhelpful because it...

codeocelot

This plugin has an implicit dependency on jdk-tool for installing the Oracle JDK. Given Oracle's recent hostile licensing changes, it seems detrimental to have plugins depend on it. I think...

llamahunter

We did a gitHub+Jenkins+Sonar integration. After the execution of Jenkins job, Code Coverage in sonarqube is updated with 26.6%(jacoco-ut.exec). But in Build coverage, it is updated as 20.54%. From where...

smurugesh1686

This mostly boils down to removing PULL/ID from USER/REPO/PULL/ID. All the other changes are debugging messages so it's easier to follow the logic. This a possible fix for #39 and...

oz123

Support configurable metrics for Jacoco and SonarQube...

1

Configuration added sonarCoverageMetric parameter. Known parameters that work are: coverage, branch_coverage, and line_coverage. I do not have access any Cobertura or Clover envs, so only changed Jacoco to support it...

aknowles

Hey, For numerous reasons we don't store the `jacocoTestReport.xml` in our GitHub repos, however it is generated during our jenkins process in a docker container. Would it be possible to...

tstokvis

Constantly getting 0% master coverage on non PR branches

1

Hi, Here is my scripted pipeline code: ``` def executeChecks() { if (params.SKIP_TESTS) { echo('Skipping Test stage') return } stage('Test') { executeCompatibilityChecks() executeUnitTests() } stage('Record Coverage') { if ( env.DEFAULT_BRANCH...

spbkelt

Reporting incorrect coverage percentage from xml file

5

Thanks in advance for looking into this. I have atttached the xml file that the plugin is reading. In github it says that coverage is 48% but the actual coverage...

valemany