copyartifact-plugin icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
copyartifact-plugin copied to clipboard

[JENKINS-12134] Only fingerprint if source does.

Open jorgenpt opened this issue 12 years ago • 12 comments

This only fingerprints if the source project has "fingerprint all archived artifacts" enabled. This also adds tests for this behavior.

Creating a pull request to get some more eyes on this before I push it to master.

jorgenpt avatar Jan 12 '12 18:01 jorgenpt

I've released 1.21 with better implementation of this that hopefully hides the overhead. Keeping this pull request open in case he still complains, but we shouldn't merge this until that's confirmed.

kohsuke avatar Jan 12 '12 22:01 kohsuke

Sounds good

On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 2:14 PM, Kohsuke Kawaguchi < [email protected]

wrote:

I've released 1.21 with better implementation of this that hopefully hides the overhead. Keeping this pull request open in case he still complains, but we shouldn't merge this until that's confirmed.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

https://github.com/jenkinsci/copyartifact-plugin/pull/8#issuecomment-3471539

jorgenpt avatar Jan 12 '12 23:01 jorgenpt

I would still like to make it optional, as with a large number of small artifacts, the fingerprinting process takes much longer than the actual IO, even after 1.21

mandeepr avatar Jan 17 '12 02:01 mandeepr

+1 to skipping fingerprint if neither source nor destination project use fingerprinting at all.

alanharder avatar Feb 11 '12 17:02 alanharder

any update on this? should this request be closed or added?

alanharder avatar Mar 11 '12 16:03 alanharder

+1 to adding this still

mandeepr avatar Mar 11 '12 20:03 mandeepr

+1 to make fingerprinting optional. Fingerprinting is overhead for our build process.

ringods avatar Mar 21 '12 15:03 ringods

Sounds good to me. If the optionality is per artifacted file, this is exactly like I'd expect copy artifacts to work. Ie you can copy many files in one copy artifacts request, some of them are fingerprinted, some are not.

nanonyme avatar Mar 26 '12 08:03 nanonyme

Btw, https://github.com/jenkinsci/copyartifact-plugin/pull/11 also implements this functionality. Could you please work with the author of the other pull request decide which of these makes more sense and have that one reviewed and the other one closed?

nanonyme avatar Jan 09 '13 23:01 nanonyme

Thank you for a pull request! Please check this document for how the Jenkins project handles pull requests

jenkinsadmin avatar Jul 17 '13 04:07 jenkinsadmin

Given that #11 was merged, this can probably be closed.

daniel-beck avatar May 01 '14 15:05 daniel-beck

Can this be closed now?

sam-spain avatar Oct 19 '21 13:10 sam-spain