jelmer
porcelain.add() not add in all files...
Maybe i am missing something but i tried to find why i am missing files when using porcelain.add() vs git add " One thing i seem to notice in my environment is that files do not get added by porcelain.add() and when i do the same with git add they are added to tracked files.
I used the dulwich.py command line example and version 0.19.7
To show what mean i created a directory with two subfolders and two files in the root. Initialized it and ran "dulwich.py add" - result is this:
dulwich.py status
Changes to be committed:
add: folder1/file3
add: folder2/file4
Untracked files:
file1
file2
.gitignore
folder2/file4
folder1/file3
the output of git status
On branch master
Initial commit
Changes to be committed:
(use "git rm --cached <file>..." to unstage)
new file: folder1/file3
new file: folder2/file4
Untracked files:
(use "git add <file>..." to include in what will be committed)
.gitignore
file1
file2
Is there something totally obvious that i am missing?
On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 07:10:57AM -0700, dominiquevocat wrote:
Maybe i am missing something but i tried to find why i am missing files when using porcelain.add() vs git add " One thing i seem to notice in my environment is that files do not get added by porcelain.add() and when i do the same with git add they are added to tracked files.
I used the dulwich.py command line example and version 0.19.7
To show what mean i created a directory with two subfolders and two files in the root. Initialized it and ran "dulwich.py add" - result is this:
In what directory are you running "dulwich add" ? Are you specifying any absolute or relative paths to it? You may be hitting #575
-- Jelmer Vernooij [email protected] PGP Key: https://www.jelmer.uk/D729A457.asc
need to look into it. before running porcelain.add i set the os.chdir(repolocation) so i always work with a repo '.'
