Jeff Huber
Jeff Huber
hmmmm. That's an interesting idea. @HammadB thoughts?
@thorwhalen here is the docs repo :) https://github.com/chroma-core/docs thanks for thinking this through with us!
@AugustKarlstedt we would love to get this merged! would it be ok with you if I hijack it and remove the UUID->string change for now?
@AugustKarlstedt this PR got pulled into the large backend refactor that @levand and @HammadB are working on. thanks for guiding us through it with this PR. Changes will be integrated...
consider alongside https://github.com/chroma-core/chroma/issues/254
@levand im guessing this is not a part of the refactor because we are keeping the API the same, correct?
- difficulty: would require copying logic down from frontend into backend - fairly straightforward - concerns: performance in the distributed system --> validators that require round trips
@jakexia72 one thing that would work today is to pass the timestamp as metadata and store it inside chroma. You can then filter by that. Did you happen to check...
@jakexia72 makes sense with joins! the cost is currently the serialization and deserialization in the REST API. We have plans to use a binary format in the future to avoid...