Please consider an explicit license for the repo

[mpenning]

Hello,

How is this repo licensed? If it's licensed MIT, then that's permissive and I can almost do anything with it; however, if it's licensed GPL, derived works must be licensed the same way and published. I'm interested in potentially integrating this with other libraries, but I'd like to understand the terms and conditions. If you're not sure which license to use, there is a pretty good guide here:

http://choosealicense.com/

Even if you just declare it as WTFPL, that's better than no explicit licensing terms

[jedelman8]

Sorry the delay here. Just haven't been working on this project. If you are open to have a call 1:1, we can discuss. Let me know.

[darrelclute]

This is something that has been brought up in the past in issue #28 and #30. I would be open to helping out with this discussion as well, as well as any discussions about the future of the project which are still open from issue #30.