Jean Abou Samra

> @ChrisBarker-NOAA Let's see if we can unblock this PR since the proposed content is an improvement over what exists. Next step would be to remove the conflict and take...

This PR looks really useful, but unfortunately has been open since January. Would any maintainer have the time to take a look?

A lot of this has been done in the meantime. PEP 517 is pending with [#1414](https://github.com/pypa/packaging.python.org/pull/1414) (currently waiting on [#1396](https://github.com/pypa/packaging.python.org/pull/1396)). Here's my list of what remains: - [PEP 660](https://peps.python.org/pep-0660) Editable...

#1441 is open for PEP 656 / musllinux. > Is anyone working on the simple repository API PEPs? I can't find any other issues or merge-requests on the topic. I...

I just noticed one more item: [this part](https://peps.python.org/pep-0566/#json-compatible-metadata) of PEP 566 (how to transform core metadata into JSON).

> [PEP 561](https://peps.python.org/pep-0561) Distributing and packaging type information — I plan to do this as well After starting to work on it and getting more familiar with the PEP, I'm...

> I think it would be good to have a guide on packaging type information in the PUG In fact, this is covered on https://typing.readthedocs.io/en/latest/source/libraries.html. It looks out of date,...

I was going to say that this is all covered by the [Installing packages](https://packaging.python.org/en/latest/tutorials/installing-packages/) tutorial and the [Install packages in a virtual environment using pip and venv](https://packaging.python.org/en/latest/guides/installing-using-pip-and-virtual-environments/) guide, but curiously,...

@dstufft You might be interested in reviewing this, maybe also @pfmoore?

@EpicWink What is the status of this PR now that #1477 has been merged?