Jean-Christophe Manciot comments

Results 58 comments of


                                            Jean-Christophe Manciot

[1.4.3] Failed to get user/group name for some UID/GIDs although they all exist

@buhtz > I only see DEBUG messages in your output. Do you have any errors or the snapshots taken are not complete? No, but can these false reports impact the...

[1.4.3] Failed to get user/group name for some UID/GIDs although they all exist

> In which context ocured that debug messages? Did you created a package for your PPA? You run tests? Or is it really a real take snapshot run? It's just...

[1.4.3] Failed to get user/group name for some UID/GIDs although they all exist

> You you send the full debug output please. ``` ========== Take snapshot (profile ): Wed 13 Mar 2024 07:12:35 PM CET ========== DEBUG: [common/backintime.py:589 argParse] Arguments: {'debug': True, 'profile':...

[1.4.3] Failed to get user/group name for some UID/GIDs although they all exist

> Can you please take a look into the snapshot log. But don't post it here. It may contain sensible information. Nothing significant in the log except maybe this: ```...

[1.4.3] Failed to get user/group name for some UID/GIDs although they all exist

With a new snapshot, I get the same UIDs/GIDs DEBUG issues with a successful rsync return code (0).

[1.4.3] Failed to get user/group name for some UID/GIDs although they all exist

IMHO, the code that tries to get user/group names from UIDs/GIDs should be removed altogether.

[1.4.3] Failed to get user/group name for some UID/GIDs although they all exist

@buhtz I've discovered why this issue happens: bit tries to get the username/group name on the host which started the snapshot, although the snapshot was made over a remote host...

[Feature request] Allow the user to pass a complete RPC file

@choppsv1 @userzimmermann The new RPC call syntax could look like this: ``` netconf-client --host --port 830 -u -p --rpc rpc_file.xml ``` Any thoughts?