Jon Herman

Hi Brett, Thanks for using the library. The approach you described is what I've suggested to people in the past (https://waterprogramming.wordpress.com/2014/02/11/extensions-of-salib-for-more-complex-sensitivity-analyses/). But, I never thought about the fact that it...

That's a tough situation. It's true that Morris tends to converge faster than Sobol. But 500 model runs with 9 uncertain parameters is still not very much. You might consider...

No, unfortunately SALib doesn't work with model output that contains complex numbers. One option might be to look at the sensitivity of the real and imaginary components separately. I'll leave...

Thanks Will! This could work for all of the analysis methods too, not just Morris. A couple of questions about what you're envisioning: - Would the `analyze` functions allow either...

Hi @RexFuzzle thanks for using the library. As far as I know this hasn't been implemented yet. Will might have something in the Morris method, but that's it. There's also...

This is an open issue for all methods. We want to be able to pass in a matrix of model outputs and have all of the Si values returned somehow....

Hi @spizwhiz , All of the methods in SALib currently assume independent parameters. You could write your own modification to impose a correlation on a sample, but I'm not sure...

@lukas1994 yes, you should be able to swap any sampling method in place of LHS here

Thanks! for reference this is the HDMR method in #275 , we will start reviewing.

Hey Will. Does assert always need to throw an error when the assertion fails? In this case I think it'd be better to silently convert to np.array.