Jason Desrosiers
Jason Desrosiers
> Sounds like if we go in this direction, we should not only make the currently optional tests required, but also extend them a lot more Agreed. I think the...
> Should implementations automatically pass validation for these or fail them? I have different opinions depending on how we end up defining what asserting on `format` requires. If we're strict...
> making `format` to validate by default would be a massive breaking change I think everyone has recognized this is a breaking change, but I'm glad this was brought up...
@SorinGFS I think we're talking about two different things. If I understand you correctly, you understand `format` to be a kind of semantic identifier. `"format": "date"` would indicate that the...
I agree that it's wrong, but I think the test is wrong, not the description. The test should be updated to match the description.
You're right, but that's not what I meant. Look at all the descriptions for all the tests. It's a matrix of the possibilities of two variables: (1) if result (2)...
@rishabh1721, this was just a question. There's nothing to do. I'm going close this because it appears to be resolved or at least isn't being actively discussed anymore.
Sorry, @smikulcik, I skimmed the issue too briefly and missed that there was a keyword proposal included there. I'll reopen the issue, but given the lack of responses so far,...
> Our `.gitignore` is getting pretty specific. Would it be possible to output all of the files to a specific folder so that we can just ignore that folder? Yes,...
(The force push as just a rebase. Nothing changed.)