John-David Dalton

Hi @usman-subhani! Can you post what the transpiled code looks like?

Hi @jamesloewen! Would you be up for creating a PR?

Nice find @julien-f! Thank you for the repro too!

This is moving to a [consensus PR](https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pulls?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Apr+label%3A%22needs+consensus%22) *(I'm unclear what stage that maps to)*. That said, stage 2 sounds like a good place.

I'm :-1: on closing. There's currently 26 open issues *(not too bad considering Babel proper has ~500)* and this is something that's totally valid.

I wouldn't get too comfortable with TLA as it is in stage 2 (variant B alone). Several folks have issues with it. As is, and if left unchanged, it will...

Yep. That said though, Babel is an open source project with limited resources. Since this proposal currently has significant complications, and will likely require changing, their resources may be better...

@MylesBorins > None of those were brought up at the last meeting I believe some were unclear at the last meeting on exactly which parts were making it to stage...

> Why break the symmetry in the syntax for a concern that already applies to both the import and re-export cases? No worries. Clause order was brought up and is...

@pshrmn > If only `export default from "module";` is allowed, then the only way to get multiple default re-exports to work (for example in an index file) would be to...