Jude Nelson

Just make sure CI passes

@jbencin @janniks This finding belongs in an issue and should be tackled by a separate PR. Thanks! :pray:

I think in your specific example, there's gonna be a SIP to make it possible to pay the transaction fee in sBTC. See [here](https://forum.stacks.org/t/enabling-sbtc-as-a-gas-asset-on-stacks/15823)

How is this going to help? The signer will need to be communicating with the node over a trusted network as it is (ideally a loopback interface), because any latency...

You deleted this, but I think it's a valid question: > And the fundamentally correct way would be...? If I were doing this, I would just create a trait called...

~~TODO: add 100% coverage for the look up table -- compare the unit test output that derives it to each element (so we can catch any inadvertent changes).~~ EDIT: Done

Seems these unit test failures are a result of the new MEV system denying wins due to mining too infrequently.

I have all the unit tests passing locally (was a bug in `TestPeer` not setting the block-commit input correctly), but the integration tests will take more time. The problem is...

Got the updated values here: From 839,360 to 840,360: ``` --------------- All epoch2 wins --------------- miner,count "16ZvoJe7omzCqRPiQrLQF6WgVoCKGBwEyi",5 "18hofVCQv8cMDpqDNqSXyrUDffq7MKLxiu",194 "18vLESUz2t6oqp4HyFuAyzsB9hVAeWuFB4",138 "1EJacE9v42VgfUGEXJkuNoEwGEjNoqipjm",13 "1EUNR3CWRaPSw9t35RHeJHT6DsYCvJTADe",1 "1JRhv7zRN9xCyTntYT5nuupg7JMsE7YocL",60 "1NDxDDSHVHvSv48vd27NNHkXHYZjDdVLss",85 "1UiW61F9xnBnnC1J69aPJhFm3ZXvZEkCm",290 "bc1qgdq67upw5909ctmm3t54zpk4xcz8ncm5ggafcr",71 (null),143 --------------- All epoch3 wins...

> In order to support #4039, the answer to (2) would need to be something like the parent of new_block It needs to be the parent of the first block...