James Craig Burley

Thanks, I am considering that! Is there much interest in it? On April 24, 2018 4:30:23 PM EDT, Mark Probst wrote: >I'm sorry, I haven't touched this project in years...

...and yet it's already quite awesome! Do you have a pointer to notes about the design, what's needed, pet peeved, etc.? And/or, perhaps we could live-chat about it sometime? On...

Note that I'm not a big fan of overloading the argument(s) to `load` such that either a string _or_ a symbol name (rather than just the latter) is supported. But...

> I'd be hesitant to change current `load` behavior. Maybe we could add a 2-args arity to `load-file` that takes `opts` map as the second argument, with a key like...

> I agree it makes sense to get rid of pack/unpack machinery to reduce complexity. However, going back to unprocessed source code doesn't make much sense to me. This is...

> Hello @jcburley , have you tried disabling v2 for `docker-compose` with `docker-compose disable-v2` to ensure that `docker-compose` still used v1? Reference: https://docs.docker.com/compose/cli-command/#install-on-mac-and-windows That's good to know about, but it...

> It is a bit hacky, but you could detect the version of `docker-compose` in the beginning of the script, downgrade to v1 if necessary and upgrade it again to...

Thanks for the idea! However, the more I learn about our use cases, the more I think (hope?) we'll be eliminating these older test scripts that rely on independently computing...

> Didn't fix mine, FWIW. Renaming the var entirely did though!

Tried out Planck just now, but it seems [Lumo](https://github.com/anmonteiro/lumo) is about **2x** faster (when starting) and uses about the same amount of VM, while [Joker](https://github.com/candid82/joker) (a Clojure interpreter written in...