Support for PR Reviews?
Is there any support for PR reviews?
https://developer.github.com/v3/pulls/reviews/
@ChoiByungWook not yet, but we need to add it
Job #1346 is now in scope, role is DEV
@yegor256/z everybody who has role DEV are banned at this job; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually or invite more people to the project, as explained in §51
@yegor256/z everybody who has role DEV are banned at this job; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually or invite more people to the project, as explained in §51
@0crat status
@yegor256/z everybody who has role DEV are banned at this job; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually or invite more people to the project, as explained in §51
@0crat out
@yegor256/z everybody who has role DEV are banned at this job; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)
@yegor256/z everybody who has role DEV are banned at this job; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)
@yegor256/z everybody who has role DEV are banned at this job; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)
@yegor256/z everybody who has role DEV are banned at this job; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)
@0crat out
@yegor256/z everybody who has role DEV are banned at #1346; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)
@0crat status
@yegor256/z everybody who has role DEV is banned at #1346; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)
@yegor256/z everybody who has role DEV is banned at #1346; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)
@yegor256/z everybody who has role DEV is banned at #1346; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)
@yegor256/z everybody who has role DEV is banned at #1346; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)
@yegor256/z everybody who has role DEV is banned at #1346; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)
@yegor256/z everybody who has role DEV is banned at #1346; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)
@yegor256/z everybody who has role DEV is banned at #1346; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)
@yegor256/z everybody who has role DEV is banned at #1346; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)