Joel Brockman

Results 43 comments of Joel Brockman

If we can run this again, I can test it and provide feedback on a solution.

@livebe01 Is there a way we can tackle this now without a session? Not sure what was done to trigger this response, if maybe @mmccarl can remember what was done...

Hi @AlexThurston - Unfortunately this is something that likely won't happen for a number of reasons, but at a base level the time investment on something that the usefulness is...

Hi @bfussell - Are you looking for an official NIST KDF Kerebos certification implementation, or just looking for test vector set gen/val?

OK, thanks! Just for the record, the certification would require a CMVP assessment to make sure the algo fits specs, and the test vector set gen/val would be a lack...

Thanks for pointing this out. This is a requirement, [here](https://github.com/usnistgov/ACVP-Server/blob/a4636bcb9d7e70b3e857f537cc13bf7554eee2ee/gen-val/src/generation/src/NIST.CVP.ACVTS.Libraries.Generation/KDA/Sp800_56Cr2/TwoStep/ParameterValidator.cs#L103) we call the KDF [validation](https://github.com/usnistgov/ACVP-Server/blob/master/gen-val/src/generation/src/NIST.CVP.ACVTS.Libraries.Generation/KDF/v1_0/ParameterValidator.cs#L124-L167) and the docs should match, #1499 takes care of it. Appreciate the help!

Hi @AlexThurston, I am currently looking into this and will get back to you. Thanks!

@MichaelPaddon Sorry about that, very weird. I just reran and added them, they'll go out with the next hotfix.

Hi @markowitz-isc! 1. These were missing and added to the docs late June. Thanks for letting us know! 2. They are meant to be read on a per-case basis by...

Hi @powersmc, sorry for the delay in this, but I am trying to reproduce your error and am unable to do so. Do you have any active knowledge that this...