Joe Banks
Joe Banks
Hi @AbdelbassitAb, just checking whether this is still a feature you'd like to implement? You may need to pull in some updates from the `main` branch, if you no longer...
Closing for now as this appears to have gone stale and has outstanding conflicts.
Closed in 2025 review of open issues. We do not feel there is a large need for this feature.
> Hey, I’d like to work on this issue if it’s still available. Please assign me! > > > E.g. the command > > > > ``` > > !d...
Closed in 2025 review of open issues. We do not feel there is a large need for this feature.
> Works for me here It does not always produce this result, we haven't seen this behaviour in a bit I don't think but it's (as specified originally) not something...
It's not a solved issue and I don't think there are any PRs open to solve it yet, it's not a transient bug, it's a permanent bug with how the...
> [@jb3](https://github.com/jb3) Should we mark this as closed? It's a separate issue no? I split them out intentionally because this behaviour is unrelated to the behaviour you changed in your...
I am changing the scope slightly of this. We will not support messages with more than 6 attachments still, as anything over that just generates huge screen filling messages that...
Not all attachments form media galleries.