Jason Robinson

I do have to disagree on not representing users as proper AP actors. There is no reason not to also represent repositories, organizations and such as actors too - that...

> Issues would then simply be modeled as Note and comments as Note with a inReplyTo property? IMHO maybe avoid using `Note` in a too generic way, even though it...

How servers handle the git stuff is IMHO implementation details of server itself. How I see this work (a protocol for communicating between servers) is creating a common (ActivityPub based)...

Won't the most difficult thing be keeping the actor ID, which currently is `https://wedistribute.org/wp-json/pterotype/v1/actor/-blog` ? Because if that changes, all implementations will see it as a new actor anyway :thinking:

> anyone may send a message to the group That is actually not true - the list is moderated to members only, for writing. Anyone can however participate here on...

If someone decides what goes through, it's the same thing :) I'm not arguing here, I'm just saying it's not an open list.

ActivityPub already has the vocabulary for this, mainly the [Block](https://www.w3.org/TR/activitystreams-vocabulary/#dfn-block), [Ignore](https://www.w3.org/TR/activitystreams-vocabulary/#dfn-ignore) and [Flag](https://www.w3.org/TR/activitystreams-vocabulary/#dfn-flag) activities. So IMHO nothing new is required on the protocol level. Behaviour patterns should also IMHO be...

IMHO the only way is for the original server to do access control. What does giving a remote user contributor access to your repository mean in terms of federation? Possibly...

I'm personally of the opinion it would be much nicer for server information to come out of Synapse (or other servers) directly, via configuration. The reason: setting up and running...

This can probably be closed now that groups are removed from Synapse too.