Jan von Harten

Hi @domist07 , is it correct though that you get the "correct" behavior when plotting the lithology block model (e.g. in a cross section?). If I rememebr correctly that is...

Hello @TobiasGlaubach , thanks a lot for this - I wrote this during my first coding steps and it needed this polishing (and probably needs some more). I will take...

> This is pending adding tests or am I mistaken @javoha ? (no rush though) Yes, might take me a bit though with the semester starting.

Hi @TobiasGlaubach, great to see that you are looking into this. Maybe I can provide some insight and my opinion on a couple of your suggestions. You already made this...

Hi domist07, can you maybe sent some more surrounding data and scale info? Based on your sections it is difficult to see how other input data might have an effect...

Hi, so why I was asking for more details: In general there has to be some input data that causes the yellow layer to bend up, and the red layer...

OK - the correct way to do it (#325) is to `geo_data.modify_kriging_parameters('range', XXX)` and then recompile the interpolator (`interp_data = gp.set_interpolation_data()` with `update_kriging` flag set to `False`. You can play...

Hi @domist07 , sorry again for the late answer. With the material you provided I was able to get a smoother result by changing the C_0 parameter (corresponding to the...

Hello @Ali1990dashti , I am actually not entirely sure where the additional 8 entries come from - but I checked it and you can just use `sol.fault_block[0,:1000]` to get the...

Great reminder, so I would definitely agree that it is messy (sorry) and that we need a better solution. What you suggest definitely makes sense from a structural/coding perspective. I...