Proposal: custom renderers

[Tenchi2xh]

It's kind of a crazy idea, but after thinking for a while about how to manage this in the settings, I think I got a simple solution in the end.

It's a bit long to explain so I'll let the images do the talking:

What do you think? It would make it much easier for including diagrams. The alternative, inlining all diagrams and ASCII art, would take a lot of space in the markdown file, and make it harder to maintain: lots compiling, copy-pasting, and escaping special characters.

Here's in text format the config format I showed in the screenshots above:

imageRenderers:
  - pattern: .*\.(monopic|mono)
    command: monodraw --unicode {0}
  - pattern: .*\.puml
    command: java -jar ~/plantuml.jar -f txt {0}

spanRenderers:
  figlet:
    parameters:
      font: -f {0}
    command: figlet {0} {1}

  toilet:
    parameters:
      font: -f {0}
      filter: -F {0}
    command: toilet {0} {1}

  rainbowCow:
    parameters:
      cowfile: -f {0}
    command: cowsay {0} {1} | lolcat -F 0.3

(Instead of regexes, it could be just lists of strings containing the relevant extensions)

Edit: something I forgot! When using the markdown image syntax (or HTML), the text/alt part could be rendered underneath the rendered image like so:

[jaspervdj]

I would still like to have something like this but I haven't yet decided on a clean format.

One design decision to make is if we want to support a long-running process (like the https://github.com/gibiansky/IHaskell kernel) or if we just evaluate the command before displaying the slide and assume it exits.

[nbrandaleone]

+1 on the idea. I would love for Patat to support AsciiArt, or some sort of UTF-8 graphics.

[Floby]

I support this because I had to inline my ascii schematics inside a

 block for it to render properly

[jaspervdj]

I'd like to pick this up now. I am leaning towards a design where an evaluator is set at the top level, e.g.:

patat:
  eval:
    command: bash

Whenever a code block is highlighted as eval, we:

1. Start a process with the given command
2. Feed the contents of the code block to the stdin handle of that process
3. Render the stdout of the command in a code block

This means that this presentation:

---
patat:
  eval:
    command: bash
...

```eval
echo "Hello, world!"
```

Is equivalent to the following presentation:

```
Hello World!
```

Some questions / concerns around the design:

1. Should the output always be wrapped in a code block? It definitely seems useful for most use cases. But not having it wrapped in a code block means you can use a command that renders markdown, which is also powerful. However, doing that would require us to re-parse the slides, so I'm leaning towards not doing this for now.
2. Should we display the input as well as the output? This seems useful if you're teaching a programming languages and you want to show REPL examples! However, you probably wouldn't want it for the images example mentioned by @Tenchi2xh. Maybe it should be configurable?
3. If we're displaying the input as I mentioned in (2), should the user press a key before we display the output? That seems useful as well for teaching. Maybe there needs to be a setting here as well? Or do we do this by default?
4. Do we need to care about the order of commands? If we have something like mkdir foo on slide 2, and touch foo/bar on slide 3, what happens if the user skips to slide 3? Should we always run all commands just once in-order and cache the result? That may cause a noticeable delay when opening the presentation or seeking...