jarro2783

Yeah I agree that it shouldn't be a preprocessor macro. If you want to do a PR for it then that would be great.

The first looks right, but the second sounds like a bug.

Which version are you using? I recently fixed a segfault when the `ParseResult` goes out of scope of the `Options` object that created it. What problem are you trying to...

What's wrong with handling the correct options after the comment at the bottom of the `try`? That way you either return with everything handled correctly or `exit` with some error...

Thee problem with returning a `ParseResult` object out of the scope of `Options` is fixed in master. Would it work to return that result if all the checks passed, and...

It could be made to work, but I just prefer not to have the possibility of uninitialised objects even existing. I suppose in this case an empty `ParseResult` just has...

I'll try to get this done in the next couple of weeks. It won't take long, I just have holidays and other things to do.

I just had a look at the code and realised that some hack I did a while ago makes this kind of difficult. I would have to do a fairly...

Can you give me an example of what you would like to do?

At the moment that won't work because the strings passed around are a temporary constructed as the command line is looked at. I'm not sure how much work it would...