jared2501

+1

I'm looking to build such a transport on an internal fork this week. If this proposal sounds good, I'd be happy to contribute it back.

hey @fsouza, @jprobinson - would ya'll be interested in this change? If so, happy to add tests / refactor.

@MHDante - I'd be a bit hesitant to include observables in an RPC library like this since it forces all consumers to use observables. It should be pretty easy for...

Hey @marten-seemann, I have a use case for quic that requires stream prioritization. I'm thinking of implementing the proposal mentioned above for quic. I have a couple quic(k) questions: -...

Ah yup, makes sense. Although, it just so happens that the use case I'm trying to support does want strict prioritization (since it's trying to send data in realtime). I...

I would love the ability to have an out-of-order stream! Additionally, it would be good to impleme the non-guarenteed delivery part of the spec too. The use case I have...

This spec: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-tiesel-quic-unreliable-http-00 Although I haven't been tracking the spec closely. Did this draft make it in? And that interface looks reasonable to me. On Sat, Sep 15, 2018, 7:08...

@ahojnnes - I literally was looking at this issue earlier in the week, and checked back and you had written exactly what I was trying to write! Thank you so...

Hey @bifurcation, before I look into the tests for this, does this look right? The issue I'm trying to fix is when a server requires client certificates, but the client...