Janna Hastings

Yes, sure. I'll take a look.

I have reviewed the ontology and would like to note a few concerns. 1. Some of the hierarchical classifications seem a bit off with respect to how I would understand...

> It is based on separating all edits (term-tracker + axioms) concerning imported terms into a file `customization.owl` > (This could also be the `oeo-shared`, but in terms of separation...

> * How do we prevent the usage of relations which were meant as "grouping-only" by the creators of external ontologies? I am not sure about this: I am not...

How will these be used? Option A: Do we want to associate actual literal values with classes or individuals that are included in the ontology? - if so then yes,...

> I wonder how unambiguous `primary energy` ∩ `coal` is. You would not use an intersection for this -- logically, the intersection of `primary energy` and `coal` is empty since...

Yes, there are two approaches. Technically these two approaches are called "pre-composition" (adding new classes to the ontology for combinations of existing classes) and "post-composition" (using combinations of ontology classes...

I don't have any update for this issue, but I think our release is not at all dependent on this issue. I don't think it will require any changes to...

It seems to me that given the compatibility problems @sfluegel05 identified, we cannot use OnToology as suggested? Can the original requesters @tillmo @Ludee comment on how essential this is?

@markus-rothkoetter is there a feature branch with the relevant annotations committed so that I could quickly check out your files with my Protege?