Joe Andrieu

@kdenhartog We must still be talking past each other. The holder is a functional term. It is, by definition, whoever holds the serialized form of a VC. As such, it...

@kdenhartog wrote > From my understanding you want to keep this aspect undefined as you believe that this is going to act as a mechanism for censorship. However, the reality...

> @jandrieu At risk of changing the topic of this issue (which is not my intention): I can think of cases where issuers do need/want to restrict the verifier-audience that...

> I agree that `proof` is not a property of VCs - it's a property of how they are secured. This I disagree with. A credential need not have a...

Definitely different types. It would be good to find or create at least a minimal specification for at least a few of these.

It would also be possible to embed the VC directly.

Yep. I'd love to see this too.

Please do not remove this. There are some use cases where providing evidence of the pre-issuance DID auth is exceptionally valuable. This property is meant to be an extension point...

I can't, today, speak publicly about either of the two initiatives I know of who are expecting this capability. What I will say is that without evidence of having performed...

Sadly, it looks like no one is maintaining the doc link. Can we just switch to github pages?