Joe Andrieu

Also, does verifying the VP verify that the subject of the VC is the signer of the VP? I think not. I think that is a validation rule applied by...

Thanks, @clehner That is, indeed, essentially the same question and reaches what I think is consensus: 1. VP verification needs the domain & challenge, and will verify that in the...

@eric-schuh and I can advance the conversion to ReSpec

There is a partial start at https://github.com/w3c-ccg/vc-api-use-cases

@dlongley Does the definition here satisfy that disambiguation? https://w3c-ccg.github.io/vc-api/#apps

Ah... But client components are NOT distinct from the app. When breaking down the CHAPI flows, it was important to consider the browser, authn.io, the chapi polyfill, and wallet iframe...

> This is a BIP incompleteness thing that should be addressed before any implementation is considered for merging. The BIP gives a technical way to "sign a message", without defining...

> > This is not a problem specific to BIP-322. It's generally handled at another layer. > > It can't be. It's a different person signing in each scenario. I'm...

I'll reiterate what I said at the TPAC session. I think there is serious conflation between the literal impossibility of "delegating statements" and the legitimate need for VCs to use...

@vongohren wrote: > @jandrieu can you reflect on the most obvious delegateable VC, concert ticket, the same way you do here? It was not mentioned but it is something that...