kolage

Nice! Looking forward to this :star_struck:

> What is the implementation like in DNF 5? I've just checked it, it's basically a clone of the dnf4 implementation. > Is there any movement on this? We'll discuss...

Thanks for the report. We should definitely at least document the behavior.

It seems it might be on purpose looking at the https://github.com/rpm-software-management/libdnf/pull/998.

Hi, thanks for the report. I agree we should fix that and replace the `g_assert` occurrences by other assertions.

Hi, maybe it's because there are older metadata available for the root user. Try running f.e. `sudo dnf check-update --refresh`.

> I think that dnf should use a single local database, instead of allowing users to have their own local version. That would be a RFE, and these are typically...

> Since dnf demands su privileges to install packages, and rightly so, then perhaps dnf should be moved to /usr/sbin, also solving the problem here described. More explicitly, a non...

An alternative solution could be also to "do nothing" instead of the reinstall action.

The only failing CI test is to be fixed by https://github.com/rpm-software-management/dnf/pull/2047.