Jamil
Jamil
Unfortunately this didn't *quite* make it into 0.6.0. It'll be coming soon as part of 0.7.0.
I expect to Arch Linux fans to throw a few tomatoes thrown at me for saying this, but the most feasible way to do this now is [with Docker](https://docs.firezone.dev/deploy/docker/). We...
@antoineozenne For Terraform, see our community-contributed modules at https://github.com/firezone/terraform-aws-firezone-vpn and https://github.com/firezone/azure-terraform-firezone. REST API should be out in 0.7.0, within a week or so™.
@EternalDeiwos JSON path would work. For the admin privs -- would you be expecting that to come in the same `groups` claim or in another, dedicated claim for that?
We probably won't be able to support this any time soon. Closing for now.
Thanks for all the input guys! Going to track this work in #1157
Hey @gbe0 -- going to close this for now as we're shifting focus to supporting our own client apps over the WireGuard clients.
@JSchlarb This is great, thank you so much for the contribution! Thoughts @AndrewDryga? We may want to keep it in a separate repo and mark it as community-contributed for now...
Our architecture is changing pretty substantially for the 1.0 release. The portal and data plane will be decoupled, and all state management will be kept in the portal only. Keeping...
@J-Ha Thanks for offering to contribute. Could I ask how you've set up your Firezone Helm chart currently? Is it a LoadBalancer Service? The new architecture performs NAT traversal so...