Release candidate

[jamiebull1]

[samuelduchesne]

@jamiebull1, I don't think the patches in geomeppy on the IDF class make use of eppy's v0.5.60 fix of extensible objects. See https://github.com/santoshphilip/eppy/issues/391

[samuelduchesne]

@jamiebull1, I don't think the patches in geomeppy on the IDF class make use of eppy's v0.5.60 fix of extensible objects. See santoshphilip/eppy#391

I made a quick and dirty attempt at patching this #252

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

:exclamation: No coverage uploaded for pull request base (master@265d0b5). Click here to learn what that means. The diff coverage is 88.01%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##             master     #249   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage          ?   89.47%           
=========================================
  Files             ?       16           
  Lines             ?     1434           
  Branches          ?        0           
=========================================
  Hits              ?     1283           
  Misses            ?      151           
  Partials          ?        0           

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
geomeppy/view_geometry.py	63.10% <60.97%> (ø)
geomeppy/geom/vectors.py	95.40% <80.00%> (ø)
geomeppy/idf.py	88.46% <83.33%> (ø)
geomeppy/io/obj.py	81.05% <83.33%> (ø)
geomeppy/recipes.py	93.02% <86.56%> (ø)
geomeppy/geom/polygons.py	84.09% <92.98%> (ø)
geomeppy/patches.py	94.73% <94.44%> (ø)
geomeppy/geom/surfaces.py	97.02% <94.64%> (ø)
geomeppy/builder.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
geomeppy/extractor.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
... and 5 more

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data Powered by Codecov. Last update 265d0b5...4f5f790. Read the comment docs.