django-pure-pagination icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
django-pure-pagination copied to clipboard

Fix for new setuptools version (Sourcery refactored)

Open sourcery-ai[bot] opened this issue 1 year ago • 1 comments

Pull Request #63 refactored by Sourcery.

Since the original Pull Request was opened as a fork in a contributor's repository, we are unable to create a Pull Request branching from it.

To incorporate these changes, you can either:

  1. Merge this Pull Request instead of the original, or

  2. Ask your contributor to locally incorporate these commits and push them to the original Pull Request

    Incorporate changes via command line
    git fetch https://github.com/jamespacileo/django-pure-pagination pull/63/head
    git merge --ff-only FETCH_HEAD
    git push

NOTE: As code is pushed to the original Pull Request, Sourcery will re-run and update (force-push) this Pull Request with new refactorings as necessary. If Sourcery finds no refactorings at any point, this Pull Request will be closed automatically.

See our documentation here.

Run Sourcery locally

Reduce the feedback loop during development by using the Sourcery editor plugin:

Help us improve this pull request!

sourcery-ai[bot] avatar Jul 19 '22 13:07 sourcery-ai[bot]

Sourcery Code Quality Report

❌  Merging this PR will decrease code quality in the affected files by 0.12%.

Quality metrics Before After Change
Complexity 5.56 ⭐ 5.56 ⭐ 0.00
Method Length 36.87 ⭐ 37.00 ⭐ 0.13 👎
Working memory 5.53 ⭐ 5.58 ⭐ 0.05 👎
Quality 79.09% 78.97% -0.12% 👎
Other metrics Before After Change
Lines 227 227 0
Changed files Quality Before Quality After Quality Change
setup.py 63.36% 🙂 63.36% 🙂 0.00%
pure_pagination/paginator.py 79.60% ⭐ 79.48% ⭐ -0.12% 👎

Here are some functions in these files that still need a tune-up:

File Function Complexity Length Working Memory Quality Recommendation
pure_pagination/paginator.py Page.pages 13 🙂 140 😞 8 🙂 55.90% 🙂 Try splitting into smaller methods

Legend and Explanation

The emojis denote the absolute quality of the code:

  • ⭐ excellent
  • 🙂 good
  • 😞 poor
  • ⛔ very poor

The 👍 and 👎 indicate whether the quality has improved or gotten worse with this pull request.


Please see our documentation here for details on how these metrics are calculated.

We are actively working on this report - lots more documentation and extra metrics to come!

Help us improve this quality report!

sourcery-ai[bot] avatar Jul 19 '22 13:07 sourcery-ai[bot]