James Cheney

As @slindley pointed out one perfectly rational reaction to this issue is to say let's just get rid of the l:attribute stuff (or at least, make it a run-time error...

Following #1133 we can now place client and server annotations on local functions, but this does not seem to suffice (or if it does, it is masked by another bug)....

Hmm. I wonder if the problem may be something like this. In jslib, when a function call is encountered the following gets run: https://github.com/links-lang/links/blob/06051521a967dd60cb5ef22c1d672d3fb8260289/lib/js/jslib.js#L1675-L1685 so, when a function call is...

Well, looking at desugarLAttributes it seems that the local functions created during desugaring for l:href and l:action are already being tagged as server functions, so there must be some other...

Meeting discussion: as a first step it seems reasonable to disallow mixing frozen and unfrozen things. Alternatively @jstolarek suggests fixing #678 might address this. Also seems related to #684.

@SimonJF we discussed this a bit further today and I think the consensus was: - if you already had in mind a fix for this that's srtaightforward to do over...

This is milestoned 0.9.2, which we hoped to get released around now. Is it likely to be resolved in the next week or so, or should we postpone it? (0.9.2...

I think these two points are related: > - refactor relational lenses library to avoid replicating database interface code > - make lenses a proper citizen in the Links ecosystem:...

> I think these two bullet points should be a separate issue See #1144

Revisiting this now that #525 is in the rearview mirror. I was trying to work out what, if any, unresolved questions there are to adopting this. Would it suffice to...