James A. Overton

Our `getOWLObjectProperty` method seems fine to me. I don't understand this problem. At least there's an easy work-around: use a label.

I'm struggling to find the time, but I will look at this.

@hkir-dev Thanks for the PR. I finally got a chance to take a first look. Overall it looks good. I have one request at this point: can you please make...

@hkir-dev Much appreciated! @beckyjackson can you please review this?

@balhoff You're right. I updated my comment. The main purpose is to run this on a base file, which should not include external/upstream axioms. But in even in a base...

Hey everybody. I lost track of this over the summer, between conferences and vacations. I apologize. I just want to check one more time that this is really, really the...

Hi @alanruttenberg. Note that ROBOT relies on [owl-diff](https://github.com/balhoff/owl-diff) for most diff functionality. We are very strict about backwards compatibility, so while we often add new functionality, we do not change...

Until now, all the use cases I've seen apply the `owl:deprecated` predicate to a named entity subject (i.e. with an IRI). The [OWL spec](https://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-syntax/) supports that usage: > An annotation...

Sorry, now I'm confused again. 1. I don't think that the existing selectors can be changed to also select axioms. The design of ROBOT `remove`/`filter` is about building sets of...

@psiotwo The recent discussion in #886 about selecting axiom annotations seems very close to this topic. Your feedback on that issue would be appreciated!