James Adarich

Yep, although I guess because of a combination of it being behind an experimental flag for most of that time and dependencies often having an impact on using functionality /...

Nice tip @mwgamble :) I'll give this a test with some other changes for 4.0.0 and add this as a recommendation with some props to you! 👍

remaining work - [x] add linting to tap-bark - [x] redirect repo links - [x] fix tests - [x] allow bootstrapping for integration tests - [x] update dev guidelines -...

linked with #277

Hey @winksaville I think this may be a bit of a challenging one to achieve. Just for further context, in what scenario would you find this would help you out?

Sure, I understand that :) I meant more from a user requirements perspective. Are you having trouble finding which test is failing for example?

Hey @winksaville, Having a look through the test code it seems like the test is doing quite a lot of things which is perhaps a part of the confusion. Each...

@winksaville I guess what @Jameskmonger is trying to say is that single assertion tests are going to comprise the majority of tests using the "given this then that" approach (or...

Sorry about the late reply @winksaville :) I guess my thinking here is we just need to get the requirements outlined correctly as the tap output is expanding and I...

Yep @winksaville agree it is going too slow. We'll need to help them out in some way. Gonna spend some time seeing how we can work with them to improve...