Jake Hader

Hi @john-science, I agree with this but internally we need to figure out where these functionalities should live if not on the zones objects in the framework. I've also mentioned...

Thanks for the input @drewj-usnctech. We are having an internal meeting next week to kick off the zones updates and changing the implementation. We will make sure to update this...

> @jakehader I would be happy to be involved as much as you'd like. Glad our investigation into `Zones` coincided with your internal meetings > > @john-science sure. We are...

@drewj-usnctech, sorry I meant to say that different zoning for different applications like rx coeffs, XS generation, thermal hydraulics, depletion, etc. not that there would only be one zone containing...

I think it's a fair assumption that most users have Python 3.7+ internally at TerraPower, but I cannot speak for all external users. Right now the installation docs do state...

@john-science - maybe we can hot patch the v0.2 release to enforce 3.7+? I don't see a reason why we need to support 3.6 at this time.

@scottyak, the 3.6 requirement has been removed in #491.

@albeanth - Would you be able to take a stab at this?

@onufer that is correct!

I'm wondering if rather than removing Point we can just turn it into a normal composite with a different set of parameter definitions. Maybe we can pull it out as...