Julian Hall
Closed by #1942
The only health warning is that 1e-9 is very small - 1e3 below the default - so there may be unintended consequences on other MIPs
That's good to hear. Better scaling is always a good idea, but it can be hard to achieve for some modellers, so we'll still have folk posting problems with the...
Thanks, I've reproduced this. `gapRel=1e-4` AKA `mip_rel_gap=1e-4` is the default value Interesting one @fwesselm: `feasible.mps` is reduced to empty so, since it's got two fewer constraints, `infeasible.mps` should also reduce...
> Now simplfied to a nearly minimal 35 rows; 30 cols; 81 nonzeros; 2 integer variables (2 binary) Thanks: the smaller the better for debugging!
> > > Now simplfied to a nearly minimal 35 rows; 30 cols; 81 nonzeros; 2 integer variables (2 binary) > > > > Thanks: the smaller the better for...
No longer reproducible
Hi there, I've noticed a regression of HiGHS on the Maros-Meszaros test set, as interfaced in [maros_meszaros_qpbenchmark](https://github.com/qpsolvers/maros_meszaros_qpbenchmark): ```console $ python maros_meszaros.py run --rerun --problem LASER --solver highs ✔ ...
If my memory serves me correctly, this was added because someone wanted to know the reason why they were getting a warning back from methods like `addRow`. Since there's no...