jaimergp

Also, there's a surprising amount of [results](https://github.com/search?q=%22conda+update+--file%22+NOT+is%3Afork&ref=opensearch&type=code) for `conda update --file` 🤔 I don't think many of those are working commands, though; we didn't take YML files as input there....

See https://github.com/conda/conda/pull/14725#issuecomment-2920150664 for last status.

Blocked on https://github.com/conda/conda/pull/14820, assisted with fixes by @soapy1 at https://github.com/conda/conda/pull/14952

I would rearrange the code so `subdirs` takes precedence, or error out if both sources are defined, or at least warn that `subdirs` is being ignored!

Not stale.

I get (and like!) (1) but what's the benefit of (2) 🤔? Curiosity, not trying to challenge the idea.

Not stale.

It's there in debug mode: https://github.com/conda/constructor/blob/b6c42339503102cf228269d4fefd4009ae4dcd47/constructor/winexe.py#L466-L472 But yea, we could change the debug level if the returncode != 0.

How would we load multiple `SparseRepodata` objects for a multichannel in a `MultiChannel`-aware API?

Yep, that's what I expect too. My question is how we would pass the "this sparse repodata belongs to this multichannel" metadata. With some argument in the `rattler.Channel` object?