booby

booby copied to clipboard

paulmelnikow

__repr__() causes maximum recursion depth error

4

The __repr__() function of self-referencing Models and Models referencing to other Models which reference to the first one, cause an "maximum recursion depth" error. Because the __repr__() function is called...

SteveGZr

following the issue https://github.com/jaimegildesagredo/booby/issues/40, i added the fields **Date** and **DateTime**

abdounasser202

Date / DateTime field

1

I think `DateField` and `DateTimeField` should be a part of this library. This is what stopped me from potentially using `booby` in my project.

piotrkilczuk

- Added new type: URL. - Added new property to fields: Description. - Added the optional use os UstraJSON, ultra fast JSON serializer. - Added 'properties' classmethod to Models. With...

cr0hn

The API I am accessing returns JSON with a field that will return `null` for almost all fields. If I POST/PUT this model back into the API, it will interpret...

ppslim

Created test for model referencing and maximum recursion depth on repr() call

1

I added a test which fails when **repr**() is called on models which reference themselves over other models. Because this results in a "maximum recursion depth" error. To solve this...

SteveGZr

Hi there. I'm working on modeling a new format which has a field that contains a dictionary of model objects. I think what I'm looking for would be something like...

paulmelnikow

Use hasattr() rather than isinstance(value, MutableSequence)

2

There are several places where the code checks specifically if something is an instance `MutableSequence`. I believe the [more pythonic](https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=python+isinstance+considered+harmful) way would be something like: ``` python # rather than...

adamcharnock

See https://github.com/jaimegildesagredo/booby/pull/28

jaimegildesagredo