Andy Fingerhut

I tried out the updated code you provided in this comment: https://github.com/p4lang/p4c/issues/2310#issuecomment-615495959 (thank you for that code, by the way) I based my changes on a very recent version (2020-May-02)...

I obviously have not aggressively pursued this line of thinking in a while, but I still would love it if someone with actual p4c compiler chops (not me, unfortunately) could...

Hmmm. I may be imagining that I tried something like this in the past month or two and it failed, but it seems to be working for a test P4...

AI for Andy: Add a test program, probably the one attached to an issue above, as a new p4c test program, that can be used to verify that future compiler...

@AdarshRawat1 I have just read the comment at the link in the first comment of this issue. If I understand correctly, the current state of this repo is that the...

Assuming PR https://github.com/p4lang/p4runtime/pull/546 enables the CI checks to pass for this PR in the near future, my intent is that this PR will be preferred over the earlier https://github.com/p4lang/p4runtime/pull/543 for...

@chrispsommers @smolkaj I would like to talk about this PR at the next P4Runtime API meeting, in hopes of merging it, or deciding how to change it before it is...

> From [addlicense](https://github.com/google/addlicense): > > > The program ensures source code files have copyright license headers by scanning directory patterns recursively. > > It modifies all source files in place...

Copying this comment from Steffen, accidentally added to a different PR: Question for Linux foundation from the P4 API WG discussion: What is their recommendation on who the copyright author...

Some thoughts on implementation details: Currently BMv2 internal data structures for table entries record not only the match criteria, action, and action parameters, but also the next-table value inside of...