Andy Fingerhut
Andy Fingerhut
@hunterzju Is it reasonable to close this issue now? i.e. was the question answered to your satisfaction?
@usha1830 @mbudiu-vmw Is this still a bug in the DPDK back end today?
+1. Has this issue been resolved? I see a linked PR #3129 but do not know whether it is intended to fix this issue, or not.
I phrased the issue in the form of a question, because I do not know whether most P4_14 implementations actually follow the "value set elements are ternary value/masks in the...
When an input program has some undefined values/behavior involved, is it a goal of a compiler to "preserve" as much of the undefined values/behavior as exist in the input program?...
If `simple_switch` zeroes out all fields on a call to `setValid`, that is definitely behavior that is specific to `simple_switch`, and not required by the language specification. It seems like...
According to the spec, interpretation #4 is correct, I believe, but as a reason I would not give "`setValid` sets header values as uninitialized". Why not? If a header is...
@hesingh In the context of the language specification, a header value being undefined does not mean that there must be some special magical "undefined" value that is different than the...
@fruffy Is it reasonable to close this issue now?
@antoninbas This issue appears to be one that was likely fixed quite some time ago. If you agree, let me know and I will close this.