Joel Andersson
Joel Andersson
> I see. Can you give me more info? Which OS? Which compiler? @jgillis, can you help?
Closing wontfix for now. Reopen if needed.
I'm reopening this issue for reasons of speed, debuggability, cleanness of code.
Good point. It makes sense to implement this method only to ensure that an error is being thrown.
OK, yet another reason to move it to the derived classes.
> I think it's a good idea. but there is then no reason not to do it for disp as well, leaving an empty SwigRef? question then starts to become...
The main issue for removing the subsref and subasgn is to do it in a way so that they are automatically added when and where they are needed. Are there...
I think that the fundamental problem is that the the subsref/subsagn mechanism is actually a higher level of abstraction compared to C++'s `operator()` and `operator[]`. You can implement a feature...
@wsfulton - do you know how to achieve this? I figured that the best approach is to add a feature called "convertself" and then emit some additional typemap code whenever...