Jacopo Scazzosi

I'm working on a control platform for Homie V5 but it's going to take a few more months.

I do not know what sort of timeframe you were looking at for finalising / releasing V5. However, should there be interest in the concept, I think V5 could do...

If we're good to go, and I do think we are, how do we "push the button"? Can I help with anything? Also, it might be a good idea to...

> I'd prefer to get v5 shipped as it is now. Sounds good to me, minor changes can be addressed in minor revisions (if needed), anyway. > Just don't know...

Trying to facilitate releasing V5, the pending tasks that I see are: - [x] merge https://github.com/homieiot/convention/pull/329 - [ ] merge https://github.com/homieiot/homieiot.github.io/pull/34 - [ ] create new `v5.0.0` commit and tag...

@dcj if I understand correctly what you're after, that should already work. Examples from current version: - https://homieiot.github.io/specification/#devices - https://homieiot.github.io/specification/#property-attributes Examples from develop version: - https://homieiot.github.io/specification/spec-core-develop/#units - https://homieiot.github.io/specification/spec-core-develop/#device-attributes

@Tieske I've added that to the list in https://github.com/homieiot/convention/issues/299#issuecomment-2869945899 . Would you be happy with that list going up into a new tracking-style issue that would supersede this one? Just...

For the time being I'll vendor this package within my own project and test the proposed change. If everything works well I'd be happy to open a PR.

> In addition, I would like this new method(s) to be generic enough to also (potentially) expose bi-term indexes, such as SO, SP, PO, and so on, as these could...

I've now been experimenting with `@deepkit/type` and `@deepkit/type-compiler` standalone for three weeks and, at the cost of repeating myself... It's AMAZING. Furthermore, you do some of the best technical writing...