Jack May
Jack May
@philipc Ran into a similar issue with section headers and `Vec::with_capacity` while fuzzing it myself. Took a stab at fixing it here: https://github.com/m4b/goblin/pull/219
Looks like this was done on purpose, why?
Yeah, was triggered by a `x % 10`
@Lichtso , @alessandrod can you guys followup on this pr?
> Why is this PR against the v1.11 branch and not against master? The author is aware that this pr should be targeting master and plans to rework it, then...
This should help: https://github.com/solana-labs/solana/pull/19475
> > > > sort txs by (additional_fee + base fee = total fee)/(requested compute units). > > > > > > > > > where does `base fee` come...
> Is it OK to use `FeeStructure::default()` instead of `bank.fee_structure` for fee calculation? FeeStructure is not fixed and will be modified at epoch boundaries over time. It probably falls into...
Or just cache the things you need and yes that is probably the best predictor without looking at current state
- `MAX_TOTAL_ACCOUNT_DATA_SIZE` could be placed in `ComputeBudget` - Yes this work needs to be featurized